can i just say that it’s possible to get on good terms with someone who used to bully you? like obviously it’s valid to want to have nothing to do with your bully, but it’s also possible to clear the air with your bullies and befriend them.
like, i had a girl in high school who made my life miserable. she was homophobic, she got me in trouble with teachers, she made fun of me, i mean it completely sucked. but we ran into each other a couple of years after we graduated. she came out to me. she apologized. she asked me for help on how to deal with her internalized homophobia. and now we’re really close friends, we hang out, we sleep at each other’s houses, we go out together. and, honestly, if this happened to grow into a romantic relationship, i wouldn’t mind. she bullied me relentlessly in high school, and now we have a beautifully healthy friendship.
and idk i feel like people see ships that involve a bully redeeming themselves and entering a friendship/romance with the people they bully and they’re like “idk how people can even ship that” or “that’s still abusive” or “that’s not a healthy relationship.”
you’re free to not like those kinds of ships. god knows i also had people who bullied me that i’m happy to not see again. but don’t criticize people who like those kinds of ships and want to see those bully/bullied relationships morph into something more healthy. that’s possible, and i feel people think that it isn’t.
there’s nothing abusive about someone wanting to become a better person and build a healthier relationship with the people they’ve hurt.
So I’m going to be bitter and old here for a minute.
The absolute refusal to allow anyone to use queer as an umbrella is both novel and regressive (I know, I know). For decades, queer was an accepted and neutral way to concisely refer to a coalition of loosely connected communities and identities. Queer theory, queer film, queer spaces, queer history.
This use came after another few decades of committed work in reclaiming the word from oppressors who flat out stole it from us.
It took a lot of effort to wrestle it back out of their hands, and now I’m expected to just give it over to them because decades of unity and collective action and shared experience don’t matter because a handful of (usually white, almost exclusively american) kids on this godawful website have deicded it’s illegal for me to “force it on others” and that I should instead just let them for LGBT or gay or whatever else on me.
Like, fuck off?
Fuck off.
I am going to refer to my community in the way that I have been doing for an entire lifetime. Not just my specific identity, which is queer as fuck, but the whole fucking shebang.
And I will not hand the word back over to straight people with a nice little ribbon and a coat of polish and say “here, some kids decided it was cool if I let you stab them with this word so here you go” like
Fucking, why would I ever.
Frankly, and I know how people are going to react to this but, frankly?
I damned well will use queer to refer to my community as well as myself, and anyone who wants to take it away from me can take it over my COLD DEAD QUEER LITTLE FINGERS.
I will not sit by and let antsy, nervous kids who don’t know a damn thing about our history talk down to me about how “well, actually” when they can’t even recognize the fact that trans people were still being policed out of here literally three fucking years ago.
The presumption and the ignorance are staggering.
So yeah.
Queer as in fuck you people in particular.
And, to my followers who are made uncomfortable by this, well. I will regret losing you on some level, but not enough to stop.
I fully intend to use queer as the umbrella term it has been for my entire life. LGBT never did my intersex, pansexual ass any favours anyway.
My point is, I’m not going to be referring to the “LGBT” community at all, anymore. It’s going to be 100% queer here, in a more conscious and consistent way than it has been before. Because, you see, even people who do use queer as an identity unashamedly have gotten into this pattern of being apologetic or conditional about it, with a constant, overbearing tone that even when we do use queer as a community term with have to hedge it and gentle it because it’s so dangerous.
but it’s fuckign not.
We spent decades pulling the danger out of it.
And ‘m not going to let it sneak back in.
Every time someone says “queer is a slur, you shouldn’t use it” I feel like they’re trying to fucking gaslight me. Like, I was there when it got reclaimed. I read “Queer Science”, I saw the “Queer Studies Departments” in college and the majors in Queer Theory. Kids do not get to invalidate my life out of ignorance. And I can’t help but think that someone who knows exactly what they are doing was behind it to begin with, because how would the kids who don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about know to invalidate that word?
You go. Reclaim that reclamation. I’ll probably use LGBT+ and queer interchangeably, like I always have, and if some kid tries to lecture my 47-year-old ass on the matter I’m just going to have to look at them over my imaginary librarian glasses and tell them “no. you’re wrong. Go back to school, kid, you need to remember you’re sharing the world with adults and there is a consensual reality you have entered into. You don’t get to make it up from scratch any more than I did.”
And I can’t help but think that someone who knows exactly what they are doing was behind it to begin with
Because it’s absolutely surreal to see someone who is fifteen years old speak as if queer’s been used to constantly attack and smear and belittle and insult them, when they’re about twenty years too late, at the very least, to have gone through that as a teenager. I’ve seen it happen so many times, with so many teenagers on here, that it reads honestly like a script – like a Discourse Point someone’s taught them that they need to trot out as an argument, always and forever, amen. I made this connection over a year ago, when the screaming against ‘queer’ started in earnest on here and thought about it more in-depth when a number of very young activists both here and on Twitter told me unironically and with a straight face that they took all of their discourse points from the likes of leftbians and other exclusionists, starting with your garden-variety aphobes and biphobes and ending with outright radfems / TWERFs / SWERFs.
That was the lightbulb moment for me. Question:
what group has managed to spread their posts and their ideas far and wide on Tumblr, because people reblog without checking the source or reading between the lines?
and what group has had a vicious ideological axe to grind against ‘queer’ as both a self-descriptor and an umbrella-term for decades now?
The answer to both is radfems. I was there ten years ago when they were absolutely driving themselves into a frothing lather over the fact that a very large number of LGBTQIAP+ youth were describing ourselves and our communities as queer uncontroversially – seriously, this was so common on the English-speaking queer youth forums I used to frequent back then that no one batted an eyelash, specifically because the work of reclamation had already been done for decades and if, asked, the vast majority of people answered that they preferred queer because it was INCLUSIVE (which is and has always been the kryptonite for groups of people whose ideas revolved around gatekeeping the community and their precious selves being the arbiters of who gets in and who stays out), Radfems quickly realized that they weren’t going to be able to demonize the word in the eyes of Gen Xers or people at the older end of the Gen Y generation in the community, because we’d either contributed to the work of reclamation or spent our whole fucking lives in communities where queer was a badge of pride.
So, in what is honestly an absolutely brilliant move and which I’d be almost tempted to admire, if I didn’t want to spit everyone involved right between the eyes, radfems and other exclusionists targeted much younger LGBTQIAP+ people, leapfrogging a generation. Tumblr, in this sense, has been absolutely vital, both in giving them access to very young people who were just discovering themselves and whose knowledge of community history was nonexistent and in being built in such a way that radfems could make their posts go viral and attract tens of thousands of reblogs, if not more, if they knew to word them in just the right way (I’ve lost count of the number of what, at a shallow glance, seem like very decent PSAs on consent, but that at a closer reading were actually anti-BDSM screeds, easy to see for anyone who knows the dogwhistles).
If radfems have managed to mire this place in their ideas intensely enough that they’ve turned their anti-kink crusade into an omnipresent thing in certain progressive communities on Tumblr, it’s not impossible to make the logical leap that they’ve managed to do so with their decades-long anti-queer crusade as well.
I’d laugh and clap at the ingeniousness of it all, if it didn’t involve obliterating decades of community history, solidarity and reclamation efforts.
Please note this. Regardless of how you personally feel about the word, this backlash against it happened much more recently than many people seem to think. And it’s worth pointing out who benefits from the backlash, and it sure as hell isn’t the people who gave decades of their lives to make the word a sign of inclusivity and acceptance.
Tumblr legit screamed about every fucking female character in a huge franchise until now and yelled about “EVERYONE WATCH THIS THIS IS IMPORTANT” but as soon as its dr who everyones just like “i dont care for the show anyway lolz fuck Moffat” and just dismisses the huge fucking feat of a female lead in a show that hasnt done that for 50 years
So yeah even tho moffat is leaving and everyone is already saying “this is BBCs way to axe the show” and “pc culture is gonna kill the ratings lmao this is why you dont cast women” THIS, ONE OF THE BIGGEST SHOWS IN THE WORLD, is what yall leave us fighting alone for. This is one feat yall dont care about huh
Thats fine, ill just show 8yo me the fucking door then. I shouldve known better than to expect anything out of this fucking site. The ONE thing you’d expect support for and immediately theres a 15k notes post like “lolll dont care”
Just shows that once this userbase has demonized something enough, even something as big as this cant phaze you, which in turn shows it aint about progression in the first place
Fuck this i shouldve known better than to be excited for this because even with a new writer its gonna be a disaster anyway and im holding everyone who had the nerve to dismiss this huge fucking step as no big deal responsible
Goodnight
IMPORTANT.
fucking reblog the shit out of this because i’m so sick of the way this site has treated doctor who and if you let the thirteenth doctor flop i swear to god i’m done.
where were those fake SJWs when they gave us a black lesbian companion who actually was a very cool character and got a happy (and very gay) ending too? if a character like Bill Potts was introduced in some other franchise tumblr would’ve lost its shit you know Where were you when they confirmed, not hinted that the main character is non-binary and not straight?
Hell, y’all wet yourself when some white girl is only /hinted/ to be gay
in general, i suppose. i’m not very fond of little kids. i don’t want them. they give me headaches and i cannot deal with their antics.
HOWEVER
you know what i do when kids talk to me? i smile. i answer them. i tell them their scribbles look really good. i open their juice boxes for them and ask to hear more about their power rangers.
because although i may not be fond of children, i was one. i remember being a kid and how much sour adults impacted my life even today. so when a child who is screaming and crying with a runny nose walks past me, i put on my smiling face and ask them what’s wrong instead of rolling my eyes.
because that’s what you do. you tolerate children even if you tend to dislike them. because kids are so impressionable and remember everything. i cannot bring myself to enjoy being around children. but that doesn’t mean i let them know.
Woah.
I always get the ‘I thought you hated kids’ when people see me being nice and talking to littlies and all I respond is ‘sure, I’m not a fan of kids and I’m not really planning on having any, but I’m not a complete asshole’
Don’t be a dick to kids, it’s super uncool.
and if you see a baby smiling at you please for the love of fuck smile back. you smiling back allows babies to develop an awareness of their impact on other people and how their emotional expression impacts others – basically their social abilities. when you smile back, the baby’s brain registers ‘i expressed a positive emotion and this caused the other person to express that same positive emotion’.
Don’t be that asshole a person carries in their memories for years and struggles against daily. Be nice to kids.
If a little kid waves at you or says hi to you, please do it back. They’re learning to interact with adults. Acknowledge them!
I think this also applies to when kids ask you about your disability. Adults know better, but kids are still learning! If a kid asks “why do you have to be in that chair?” your answer suddenly has a lot of weight in a developing human’s brain who might have an impactful influence in 20 years.
ppl who think that saying “I love you” to someone a lot makes it lose it’s meaning are so boring literally what could make you think that? if someone tells you they love you like 3 times in an hour it means that 3 separate times they were sitting there and thinking about you and how wonderful you are like. smh. say I love you to everyone that you love as often as possible bc sometimes it’s easy to forget that there are people who love you
why did shipping turn into a contest of “most accurate” or “most likely to be canon” why do i have to get a 40-slide powerpoint, three defense lawyers, a fortune teller, and a background check of myself and my whole immediate family to say i want two ppl to have sloppy makeouts in a car
Also: when did shipping turn into a ‘which relationship is the most healthiest in real life terms.’ I mean I ship people because I think their story is interesting, not to get relationship advice.
Also, it feels weird saying this as a grey asexual who finds most porn squicky, but: while “it’s interesting” is not seen as a good enough reason to like something (which it is!), “it’s hot” is seen as a shameful one.
This is bad enough in and of itself (sex is not an inherently shameful motivation!) but gets especially frustrating when it comes to the idea that the only Good queer fiction as at most sexual as a representation of Queer Characters Exploring Their Feelings In A Way Which Happens To Be Sexual. The only people who, say, like looking at girls kissing because it’s hot are gross straight men. Good Queer People are just invested in knowing the two girls have a happy and healthy relationship. And then people say “it’s ok if you’re a queer girl looking at girls or a queer guy looking at guys” which is, amongst other things, not actually much comfort to me as a genderfluid person, in fact that kind of strict gender division makes me dysphoric. If I started identifying as 100% a man, would all my sexy femslash become automatically Problematic? Would it only be ok if I write an essay about it being an Exploration of Gender and Sexuality that just happened to involve hatemakeouts? Whose interests are being served by this pressure to make all depictions of (especially queer) sexuality “pure and wholesome”?
Throughout the years, a lot of feminist critiques have panned Cinderella, including Emma Watson most recently, claiming that she’s a subservient doormat who lacks agency and waits for a man to save her throughout the course of her film. This criticism is null and void because Cinderella never once mentions wanting to find romantic love or wanting to meet the prince before attending the ball. This theory circulating, that many people have mindlessly reiterated, speculating that Cinderella planned to go to the ball to be saved by the prince is completely unfounded on the grounds that Cinderella ended up leaving the ball at midnight without so much as giving her name and, on screen, she verbally indicates that she had no idea the man she danced with the night prior was the prince at least three times. Ilene Woods, the original voice actress of Cinderella who had a lot of input into the development of the character, stated, “[Cinderella] was kind of spunky. She accepted life as it was and went after things she wanted. I think she was a spirited girl. I don’t think she needed the prince. I think she wanted to go to the ball and that was it at the moment. Then the prince wanted her and vice versa.”